Commemoration of the wars is proceed from posture of inhabitants to war. In Kosovo I was shaken by one commemoration – a house of one woman full of personal things of her sons, victims of the war. From my opinion is wide difference between commemorations, which lives with victims, and commemorations which are builded for the third or the fourth generation after war. Considering fact the reception of different aesthetic ways is changing all the time according to codes which ale belong the level of consciousness, the best way is commemorations in real place. The places lives everytime and also have some memories for past, visible more or less, that’s why Pristina is full of photos of missing people.
________________________________________________________
Starting with Kosovo there is first the almost complete absence of a collectively supported remembrance culture. This state of affairs shows in the manifold private activities aiming at restoring or establishing the memory of war in private places, and in the fringes of the public sphere. The central semantic field exploited also by the government is obviously UČK. Many places in Prishtina – subtil and central ones – bear semantics that can be brought in connection with national strife – i. e. the motif of justified armed resistance. Since the UČK is the only official opportunity of identification, it seems to dominate peoples’ historical focus. There are various non-institutionalised groups, such as fine artists, musicians, journalists etc., who implement their personal experience and work against the uniformity of historical memory currently at work. Importantly, the war is generally remembered through the institution of single individuals, if possible with a qualifiying tag on it, such as “member of the UČK”, “fallen in battle”, “killed by the enemy”, “UČK hero”. I experienced a silent agreement that, though people of any descent, social status, sex and age were killed through the war, the central group remembered are males, with the assumption behind that if you were male and killed during the war, you were a UČK combatant, and therefore loyal, or you were planning to become a UČK member. There are no public memorials for any of the UČK actions against Kosovar refugees, and few for neutral people. There are, however, private actions trying to help the remembering of casualties. Here it seems, the aim is to help their kins to cope with the loss but not exploiting ideological motivations at the same time.
In the Czech Republic, due to the greater historical depth of events, the memory of the war is hidden under layers of different experiences shared by the people, which the public sphere reflects, of course. There are on the one hand many old, or, authentic post-war memorials, that powerfully reflect the liberation of the country from Fascism through the Soviet Union. So, the only historic monuments are statements of a political idea that is no longer in place.
Contemporary monuments tend to pay more respect to the individual. So, the Tereźin monument of the weeping mother shows a plural of victims who are conceived of as one abstract body expressing individual grief. Still, there are many plates and memorial sites that need the face and name of an individual. This authenticity runs parallel to a reality which has a different focus, i. e. does not really help the memory.
In Usti nad Labem we found memorial plates for victims of Fascism in niches and far-off corners, where they are hard to be found. At the same time, the region experiences the re-emerging and public staging of ideologies from the far-right. Here, fascist semantics inextricably connected to the war are picked up, revalued and staged in public as a hands-on-it show of an organised lot who see themselves as ultimate winners. In the ritualised ways of processions and power demonstrations, I see a way of commemorating the war, too, but cynically revisionist beyond compromise
___________________________________________________________
What will be stuck on my mind are first the history of people that I had the chance to meet or listen to, the sufferings, all the problems and difficulties they had to deal with during the worst period of their lives. I will not forget the empty streets of Terezine, all the emotion that it was transcending, the cold atmosphere and the impression of experiencing all the things that seventeen thousand people were experiencing in the same place, in the same streets, just in another time.
_________________________________________________________
Well, for Germany I cannot speak a lot, but to make a more direct comparison with Czech Republic, there are a lot of differences one can think of. First of all, there are more “centralized” memorials in Czech Republic, while you have very fragmented memory. Maybe it’s a good metaphor to the state of the memory itself, which is very interpretative, fluid and many-faceted (even though I cannot say the opposite for Czech Republic). Still, this doesn’t make the Kosovar memorials more personal, or at least doesn’t bring you closer to the personal story. In the case of Teresinstadt for example, you can walk through personal stories of many individuals, through their artistic works, poems, or very intimate moments of their life.
Maybe a similarity would be the fact that the political will is not so stable (committed) in both countries, but are “being-correct-oriented”, but that has to do more with the system as a whole rather than the issue of memory, I guess.
________________________________________________________
From what we saw, it seems that in Germany the commemoration of the war is the most abstract one by now. Especially for the western part of the country, drastic political change took place about 60 years ago, so by now there are sculptures and installations discussing certain topics in a more distant way. In Czech Republic, however, we visited memorials dealing with the holocaust and those reminding of the communist regime. While for the war the artistic language is very symbolic, the communist era seems to be reminded of by displaying portrayals of important men.
The latter was almost entirely the case in Kosovo. The majority of memorials seem to be established to commemorate the ordeal of single people. More than anything, the connection to the UCK was stressed. Even on Mother-Teresa-Boulevard, having the nun’s statue as well, there are several memorial plaques telling about UCK (and thus not encouraging a peaceful dealing with past, present and future).












































































































A project for people who travel to Czech Republic, Germany and Kosovo to search and examine traces of history.




